Delhi high court case study
From: Mega M.
Category: techniques essay
Share this post:
This was potentially a trigger for the regulation of OTT platforms under the undemocratic and unconstitutional IT Rules, We consider these complaints today against these new rules to show how it provides a heckler's veto and will lead to censorship of speech which is otherwise legal. Immediately upon release, it was embroiled in controversy. The series has been criticised by various factions of the Indian society for hurting the religious sentiments of Hindus. The makers issued an unconditional apology and also removed parts of the series that were said to be objectionable.
Mamta Goyal, 28, Colquitt, Georgia. I needed help with my marketing related assignment which their writers wrote pretty well. It had Just one revision which was done on time too.
Tandav is a Case Study for OTT censorship under the IT Rules, 2021 #LetUsChill
Murder of Jessica Lal - Wikipedia
It was one of those cyber crime cases that raised concerns of many kinds including the role of "Data Protection". The crime was obviously committed using "Unauthorized Access" to the "Electronic Account Space" of the customers. It is therefore firmly within the domain of "Cyber Crimes". ITA is versatile enough to accommodate the aspects of crime not covered by ITA but covered by other statutes since any IPC offence committed with the use of "Electronic Documents" can be considered as a crime with the use of a "Written Documents".
Heidi-Darrin Becker, 23, Dexter, New York. They helped me to edit my proposal draft and formatted it to latest MLA format rules. My advisor approved it. I think they did good work
Murder of Jessica Lal
Facts :. The case involved a charge of section of the Indian Penal Code, which is an offence of rape. The charge against the accused was that on 28 March , the accused performed forceful oral sex upon the prosecutrix in his apartment without her consent and the defence from the accused at the trial court stage was that such an instance had never occurred, but after conviction at the trial court stage, the accused introduced an alternative argument which was accepted by the court that, even if the act of oral sex had occurred, it was with the consent of the prosecutrix. The evidence produced by both sides included oral testimonies, call detail records and various emails and WhatsApp chats. Issue :.
A divisional bench of Justice Indira Banerjee and Justice Krishna Murari has directed to list the matter after the ensuing summer vacation. Medical dialogues had earlier reported the case when the Delhi High Court refused the petitioner's challenge against the Delhi government's decision of not granting study leave to a doctor for pursuing MD paediatrics at PGI Chandigarh. Calling the petition infructuous, the high court had said that it cannot assume the role of an appellate authority against a decision taken at the highest level of the government. Earlier, the petitioner submitted before the High Court that he satisfied the criteria laid down for grant of study leave in the office memorandum dated November 02,